The stack should be chosen for whoever maintains it
We build with Next.js, React, WordPress, Laravel, Node.js, Python, headless CMS platforms and Shopify Plus. Which one suits you depends far less on the technology than on who will maintain it after launch, how often you publish, and what your team can already work with.
Most technology choices are made for the wrong reason. A supplier proposes what they enjoy building, or what they built last, or what sounds most current in a pitch. The question that actually decides it is duller and more useful: in two years, when something needs changing, who does that, and can you hire them.
Everything in this section
Next.js Development
Next.js development, choosing a rendering strategy per page so the site is fast, findable and not paying for work it does not need.
React Development
React development, component architecture and state management for genuinely interactive interfaces, and honesty about when a site does not need it.
Wordpress Development
WordPress development. What the platform is genuinely good at, what it costs to run properly, and when something else fits better.
Laravel Development
Laravel development, business applications on PHP, where hosting is commodity, developers are available and the framework does most of the routine work.
Node.js Development
Node.js development, APIs, real-time features and integration-heavy backends, built with its concurrency model understood rather than assumed.
Python Development
Python development, Django and FastAPI applications, data processing and AI work, chosen for an ecosystem rather than for syntax.
Headless CMS Development
Headless CMS development, content served through an API to a website, app or several channels at once, and the editor trade-off that comes with it.
Shopify Plus Development
Shopify Plus development, what the enterprise tier actually unlocks, and the honest test of whether your business needs it yet.
How we choose
Three questions, in this order. Who maintains it after launch, you, us, or somebody not yet hired. How often does content change, because a site published to weekly and a site published to twice a year want completely different things. And what does the team already know, since an unfamiliar stack transfers the cost of the choice onto everyone who touches it afterwards.
Only then does the technical comparison matter. A framework that is objectively faster and that nobody at your company can edit is not faster in any sense you will experience.
What we do not build with
We decline work outside our capability rather than learning it on a client's project. Blockchain, game development and large-scale cloud engineering are not services we offer. Saying so costs us occasional work and is considerably cheaper than the alternative.
Frequently asked questions
Which is best?
None of them, in the abstract. Each page here sets out what its technology is genuinely good at and where it is the wrong answer, because a comparison that only lists strengths is a sales document. The right choice depends on your publishing rhythm, your team and what you will need to change later.
We already have a site. Do we have to change stack?
Usually not, and we will say so when the honest answer is that your existing platform is fine and the problem is something else. Replatforming is expensive, carries real search risk during migration, and is frequently proposed for problems it does not solve.
Can our team edit the site after launch?
That is a requirement, not a feature, and it should be settled before the stack is chosen rather than discovered afterwards. If non-technical editors need to publish without a developer, that rules some options out immediately, and it is better to know that at the start.
Talk to us
Tell us what you are trying to build and we will come back with scope, approach and an estimate.